Showing posts with label frac fluid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label frac fluid. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Fracking: It could happen to you! The Cold Hard Truths about it...

Monday, October 3, 2011


Fracking…yep, it could happen to you! Our government is manufacturing an epidemic and it’s truly disturbing! If you didn’t know, New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo wants to allow fracking at the New York City Watershed and Delaware River Basin, the largest unfiltered water supply in the world that goes out to 15.6 million people in New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania. Can you imagine not being able to go into a NYC restaurant and order tap water? We’re famous for our bagels and pizza because the secret’s in the water. Now imagine if you couldn’t take a shower in your own home or wash your clothes because the water is toxic.

This is happening to people across America and in other countries around the world and it’s scary. It’s time for YOU and all of us to get involved and put an end to this dangerous new initiative! It might be coming to your town sooner than you realize. The government and the gas companies don’t care about the public; all they care about is money. And now more than ever, they can use the poor economy as an excuse to enable this practice.

My passion for this issue was spurred on by two things: watching Josh Fox’s “Gasland,” a shocking and horrifying documentary about fracking and a woman I admire very much, Vanessa Marcil Giovinazzo getting behind the cause. Vanessa’s given me so much through Brenda over the past 20 years. She literally changed my life and I want to pay it forward and help her in any way I can. She has a powerful platform to speak out from as a celebrity and she uses it the right way, to spread awareness on important topics that are affecting people on both a national and global level. Let’s help someone that’s helped us. If Vanessa is important to you, I urge you to support her and support this issue. She deserves it!

Have you ever seen water from a tap or stream light on fire? Have you seen a stream bubbling over like boiling water? Have you witnessed wildlife dying? Have you seen animals’ hair falling out? I have. Josh Fox and other organizations are shining light on the dangerous practice of fracking.

What is fracking? (Also known as hydraulic fracturing or hydro-fracking). “It is a means of natural gas extraction employed in deep natural gas well drilling.” More simply put, it is the process of drilling down and creating tiny explosions to shatter, crack or fracture (hence the term “fracking”) hard shale rocks to release the gas inside. “Once a well is drilled, millions of gallons of water, sand and chemicals are injected, under high pressure, into a well. The pressure fractures the shale (sedimentary rock) and opens cracks that enable natural gas to flow more freely out of the well.

Problems typically occur when poorly-made cement well casings leak natural gas along with fracking fluid into neighboring water wells. Generally 1-8 million gallons of water may be used to frack a well. A well may be fracked up to 18 times. For each frack, 80-300 tons of chemicals may be used.” That adds up to 1,440-5,400 tons of chemicals used over the lifespan of a well. Now I’m no fracking expert but that sounds like a LOT of chemicals – not cool anywhere but especially not around my drinking water or the water I’m gonna shower in or clean my clothes with or swim in. 

This technology boosts gas and oil production and generates $1.5 billion a year for the gas companies such as Halliburton, about one-fifth of its energy-related revenue. No surprise that one of fracking’s biggest proponents, Dick Cheney used to work for Halliburton before we were cursed with him as our Vice President for eight long and painful years.

Here are some cold hard truths about fracking you might not know...


Monday, August 22, 2011

New Recommendations Issued in Hydraulic Fracturing Review - REVISIT

Hydraulic Fracturing Review
Source: DEC

  • In Reversal of 2009 Report, High-Volume Fracturing Would be Prohibited in NYC and Syracuse Watersheds
  • Drilling Banned Within All Primary Aquifers and on State-Owned Land Including State Forest and Wildlife Management Areas
  • Drilling Permitted on Other Private Land with Rigorous and Effective Protections
  • Advisory Panel on Implementation to Be Appointed
The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) tomorrow will release its revised recommendations on mitigating the environmental impacts of high-volume hydraulic fracturing (high-volume fracturing). The recommendations contain these major revisions:
  • High-volume fracturing would be prohibited in the New York City and Syracuse watersheds, including a buffer zone;
  • Drilling would be prohibited within primary aquifers and within 500 feet of their boundaries;
  • Surface drilling would be prohibited on state-owned land including parks, forest areas and wildlife management areas;
  • High-volume fracturing will be permitted on privately held lands under rigorous and effective controls; and
  • DEC will issue regulations to codify these recommendations into state law.
These recommendations, if adopted in final form, would protect the state's environmentally sensitive areas while realizing the economic development and energy benefits of the state's natural gas resources. Approximately 85 percent of the Marcellus Shale would be accessible to natural gas extraction under these recommendations.

DEC Commissioner Joseph Martens said, "This report strikes the right balance between protecting our environment, watersheds, and drinking water and promoting economic development."
The ban on high-volume fracturing in the New York City and Syracuse watersheds represents a reversal of the Department's 2009 draft report, which would have permitted drilling in those watersheds. The New York and Syracuse watersheds are unique in that they are the only unfiltered supplies of municipal water in the state and deserve special protection. The prior report also would have allowed high-volume fracturing surface drilling in primary aquifers and on public forests, wildlife areas and parkland; the 2011 report reverses all of these recommendations.

There will be more opportunity for review and comment on the Department's recommendations. DEC plans for a 60-day public comment period commencing in August. There is no administrative or discretionary moratorium on high-volume fracturing. By law, no permits may be issued until the public comments are reviewed and considered and the final Supplement Generic Environmental Impact Statement is released.

DEC enforcement and oversight of high-volume fracturing will be rigorous and effective. No permits will be issued until DEC has the proper enforcement capacity in place to monitor all fracturing activities.

In preparing the new recommendations, DEC engaged independent consultants to perform research, sought further information from the gas drilling industry, considered more than 13,000 public comments and studied other states' regulations and experience, including site visits by Commissioner Martens and DEC officials to Pennsylvania incident sites. Since September 2009, DEC staff has spent approximately 10,250 hours updating the document. The 2011 version contains more than 900 pages, including more than 150 additional pages of data and analysis compared to the 2009 version.

The Department's extensive review has resulted in recommendations for rigorous and effective controls on high-volume fracturing on private lands. These state-of-the-art controls include such permitting rules as:

Protecting Drinking Water

  • Well water protection and other water protection: No permits would be issued for sites within 500 feet of a private water well or domestic use spring. No permits may be issued for a proposed site within 2,000 feet of a public drinking water supply well or reservoir at least until three years of experience elsewhere have been evaluated. No permits will be issued for well pads sited within a 100-year floodplain.
  • Additional Well Casing to Prevent Gas Migration: In most cases, an additional third, cemented well casing is required around each well to prevent the migration of gas. The three required casings are the surface casing, the new intermediate casing and the production casing. The depths of both surface and intermediate casings will be determined by site-specific conditions.
  • Spill control: All new guidelines will require that flowback water on site must use watertight tanks within a secondary containment. No open containment may be used. A secondary containment will also be required for all fracturing additive containers, additive staging areas and flowback tanks to ensure any spills of wastewater or chemicals at the well pad do not migrate into water supplies.
  • Stormwater Control: New permit process requiring strict stormwater control measures to prevent stormwater from contaminating water resources.
  • Regulating Water Withdrawals:
    • New Legislation: Pursuant to the Governor's signing of DEC's Water Withdrawal legislation, which the State Legislature recently passed, a special permit will be required to withdraw large volumes of water for industrial and commercial purposes to ensure there are not adverse impacts.
    • Permit Condition: All withdrawals from surface water bodies will be subject to limits to prevent impacts upon ecosystems and other water quantity requirements. Identification of the water source an applicant intends to use will be required and an annual report must be issued on the aggregate amount of water it has withdrawn or purchased.

Properly Handling Flowback Water:

Since the 2009 SGEIS, many drilling companies have started to recycle much of the flowback water, greatly reducing the need for disposal.
  • Flowback Water Disposal: Applicants must have DEC-approved plans for disposing of flowback water and production brine.
  • Drilling & Production Waste Tracking: DEC would institute a process to monitor disposal of flowback water, production brine, drill cuttings and other drilling waste streams that is similar to the handling of medical waste.
  • Water Treatment Facilities: Requires full analysis and approvals under existing state and federal water laws and regulations, which must be completed before a water treatment facility could accept flowback water. This would include a treatment capacity analysis for any publicly operated treatment works facility (POTW) and a contingency plan if the primary disposal for wastewater is a POTW.

Taking Local Governments & Communities into Account:

  • Local Government Notification: DEC would notify local governments of each well permit application for high-volume fracturing.
  • Local Land Use & Zoning: Applicant must certify that a proposed activity is consistent with local land use and zoning laws. Failure to certify or a challenge by a locality would trigger additional DEC review before a permit could be issued.

Identifying Fracturing Fluid Chemicals:

  • Chemical Identification: The 2011 SGEIS identifies 322 chemicals proposed for use in New York and includes health hazard information for each as identified by the NYS Department of Health. Applicants must fully disclose to DEC all products utilized in the high-volume fracturing process. In addition, applicants must agree to publicly disclose the names of the additives, subject to appropriate protections for proprietary information.
  • Chemical Alternatives: Operators will be required to evaluate using alternative additives that pose less potential risk.

Protecting the Air:

  • Air Quality: Requires enhanced air pollution controls on engines used at well pads. DEC will monitor local and regional air quality at well pads and surrounding areas.
  • Greenhouse Gas Impact: Requires use of existing pipelines when available rather than flaring gas.

Conserving Habitats:

  • Private Forestland: Disturbing the surface of the land is strictly restricted in forests of 150 acres or more by requiring applicants to comply with best management practices.
  • Private Grasslands: Disturbing the surface of the land is strictly restricted in grasslands of 30 acres or more by requiring applicants to comply with best management practices.

Making Sure We Get It Right - Community Impacts Still Under Study:

The 2009 SGEIS did not adequately consider the community and socioeconomic impacts of high-volume fracturing. To address this deficiency, DEC has engaged independent consultants to thoroughly research these types of effects.
Specifically, researchers are examining both baseline data and the potential effects of development in the areas of:
  • Socioeconomic conditions including positive and negative impacts;
  • Transportation infrastructure, current road use and the impacts of increased traffic; and
  • Visual and noise impacts.
DEC expects the research to be completed by July 31, 2011. This research will be considered and reflected in the final draft of the report.

Appointment of Advisory Panel to Develop Implementation Plan:

Upon final adoption of the permitting standards, the Department will implement a system of oversight, monitoring and enforcement. The successful implementation of high-volume fracturing policy will also require close consultation with local governments and communities.
Commissioner Martens will announce the formation of the High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing Advisory Panel, which will be composed of outside environmental and industry experts, and local government representatives. The Panel will be charged with developing recommendations for:

  • funding to ensure the proper oversight, monitoring and enforcement of mitigation measures, including both state and county agencies responsible for drilling activities and reviewing water sampling data;
  • measures to minimize socioeconomic and other impacts on local governments and communities;
  • a fee structure for drilling development; and
  • a mechanism for the funding of infrastructure improvements

please comment


.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

How Pennsylvania’s Fracking Chemical Disclosure Rules Stack Up Against Other States

August 12, 2011 | 8:27 AM
By Scott Detrow
When people hear poisonous chemicals are being shot into the ground, they understandably get nervous. During the early years of the country’s shale drilling boom, there was next to no transparency, when it came the details of chemicals used during the hydraulic fracturing process. But over the past year, Pennsylvania and four other states have passed laws or regulations requiring much more disclosure from drilling companies.

A federal Department of Energy report released this week pressed for immediate well-by-well disclosure of chemicals used during the hydraulic fracturing process. While the energy panel concluded the possibility of fracking fluid polluting drinking sources is “remote,” the report said “public confidence in the safety of fracturing would be significantly improved by complete disclosure.”

Currently, there’s no federal disclosure requirement in place. That’s due to the much-publicized 2005 “Halliburton loophole,” which excludes fracking fluid from federal disclosure rules. Within the past year, Pennsylvania and four other states have passed their own disclosure regulations, requiring companies to report what chemicals they’re injecting deep underground in order to extract natural gas.

A StateImpact analysis of disclosure guidelines in five other fracking states — Pennsylvania , Arkansas , Michigan , Texas and Wyoming — found the commonwealth lagging behind in one key area: public access to the well-by-well chemical information. When it comes to how detailed companies are required to be in listing each fracking chemical, Pennsylvania falls in the middle of the pack.

Where Things Stand in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania’s disclosure regulations went into effect in February, 2011. Here’s how they work: Within thirty days of well completion, an operator submits a report to the state Department of Environmental Protection, including “a list of the chemical additives used in the stimulation fluid, [and] the percent by volume of those chemical additives.”

For chemicals deemed hazardous by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the reports go a step further. Companies are required to report those chemicals to the Department of Environmental Protection, and include each compound’s chemical abstract service number. That’s a unique identifier — a fingerprint, of sorts — for the substance used. (OSHA regulations require those hazardous chemicals to be listed at each site, on what’s called a material safety data sheet.)

Once DEP receives that information, it’s reviewed by an inspector and filed in one of the agency’s regional offices. The reports aren’t posted online. One DEP official says the department doesn’t have the technology to do that right now, though the agency is hoping to launch a public database within the next few years. An individual can request the completion reports through the Right to Know process, though he or she won’t be able to view the chemicals operators had designated as “trade secrets.”

The Marcellus Shale Coalition, which represents gas drillers in Pennsylvania , is “overwhelmingly on board” with the disclosure regulations, according to spokesman Travis Windle, who said the group would support a move toward posting the information online. Environmentalists want to see a public database, too. “I don’t think we’re quite there yet,” said PennEnvironment’s clean water advocate, Erika Staaf. “[The regulation] needs some tweaking, so not only our…agencies, but really our general public can know what’s going underground, and what’s coming back up.”

Disclosure Regulations Differ in Other States
Wyoming was the first state to pass disclosure regulations. Its guidelines went into effect about a year ago, in September 2010. The state’s rules are stronger than Pennsylvania ’s in two respects: First, companies are required to disclose the details of all of their chemicals, not just the compounds deemed hazardous by OSHA. Second, the reports are then posted on the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s website. And while the state’s website has a labyrinthine mid-90s design, that information is still out there for public consumption.

Steve Jones, a lawyer with the Wyoming Outdoor Council, called the regulations a good first step. “I think there is enough specificity with the requirement that they post the [chemical abstract service numbers]. We do like that about it,” he said. “One problem that bothers me is the trade secrets deal.”

Like Pennsylvania and every other state, Wyoming allows companies to strike certain chemicals off the public list, out of concerns their identity would harm the drillers’ competitive advantage. But unlike in the commonwealth, the Wyoming regulation gives the final say on whether or not a chemical is, in fact, a “trade secret,” to state regulators, not the companies.

Arkansas’ regulations have been on the books since January, 2011, and they’re the strongest of the five states requiring some form of disclosure. The state’s Oil and Gas Commission requires drilling companies to pre-register lists of chemicals they plan to use during fracking, and then file well-specific reports once completion has finished. Abstract service numbers are required for all chemicals – not just hazardous ones – and if a company files a trade secret request, it still needs to list the chemical’s family name. “We have 362 chemicals with CAS numbers that have been released,” said Commission Director Lawrence Bengal. “Only 64 don’t have numbers.”

If a company wants a trade secret exemption, it needs to file a detailed report to the state. Bengal said regulators have rejected or narrowed several of those request. The chemical information is all documented on the commission’s website. “You can search by company, well name, location, or permit number,” explained Bengal .

Michigan recently enacted its own, more limited disclosure regulations, for wells using more than 100,000 gallons of fluid during the fracking process. The state’s Department of Environmental Quality requires drillers to hand over a copy of their material safety data sheets during the permitting process. It doesn’t ask for the chemical abstract number, and lets the companies determine whether or not information is proprietary, but will post the results online. (The state’s director of geological surveys, Harold Fitch, says no wells have qualified for disclosure in the two months since the new rules were enacted.)

State
Enacted
Online?
Details For All Chemicals?
Trade Secret Exemptions
Pennsylvania
February ’11
No
Hazards Only
Yes
Arkansas
January ’11
Yes
All
Yes
Michigan
June ’11
Yes
Hazards Only
Yes
Texas
TBD
Yes
All
Yes
Wyoming
September ’10
Yes
All
Yes

Texas Passes First Law
While Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wyoming and Arkansas all require disclosure, the guidelines come from agency regulations, not laws. Texas is the first state to put a disclosure measure on the books, after lawmakers okayed the measure this past spring and Governor Rick Perry signed it into law in late June. The law is similar to Arkansas ’ model, though its details are still being worked out.

OSHA-defined hazardous chemicals – the ones posted on those material safety data sheets – will be listed by chemical abstract number, unless they’re designated as trade secrets. All other fracking chemicals will be listed by name. Texas will use FracFocus.org, a website run by the National Groundwater Protection Council, to post the information online.

Like their counterparts in the four other states, Texas environmentalists see the new law as a solid first step, but they’re troubled by some of its provisions. Luke Metzger, the director of Environment Texas, called the trade secrets provision problematic. “The only one who can challenge that is the land owner or a neighbor,” he said. Groups like Environment Texas, an environmental advocacy group, would be barred from appealing a company’s trade secret designation. “The people who own the property [where a well’s being drilled] are being paid,” Metzger said. “They’re likely not going to contest it.”

Trade secret appeals will go to the Texas Attorney General’s Office. “This is an existing process,” said David Blackmon, who leads the American Natural Gas Alliance’s Texas committee, that pushed for the disclosure law. “A process everyone is used [to], and knows works well.”

Many of Texas ’ details still need to be sorted out, though. While the law sets broad disclosure parameters, lawmakers are leaving its details up to the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates the energy industry and public utilities. “The Railroad Commission has to draft regulation,” explained Blackmon. “How the reporting will take place, what the due date is.” The commission has until July 1, 2012 to finish its work, but Blackmon said the goal is to wrap things up by January 1.

Once that’s complete, Blackmon said the energy industry will push for Texas ’ first-in-the-nation law to become a model piece of legislation, for other states considering similar measures. “It would be wonderful to have as a model,” he said. “Because…the regulation the Railroad Commission comes up with is going to be the most transparent, expansive one that exists.”

Would a law be stronger than agency-issued regulation? Only if the standards were different – say, if Pennsylvania passed a law requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to post chemical information online. Otherwise, officials in Pennsylvania and other states say current regulations are just as effective. “Rules and legislation have the same enforcement authority,” said the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission’s director, Lawrence Bengal. “We already have the same legislative authority to adopt a rule like this anyway,” he added, saying a law would give the commission “no increased enforcement.”

The director of the Pennsylvania DEP’s Bureau of Oil and Gas Management, Scott Perry, agreed. “To the extent the legislature wants disclosure within a time frame, that could change things [compared to the current regulations],” he said. “But as far as force and effect, I think it’s the same. If those words [from the newly-revised regulations] showed up in the Oil and Gas Act, nothing would change.”

If Governor Corbett endorses his Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission’s recommendations, things might. In last month’s final report, the panel called for a shift in the way drillers file well completion reports, so that the documents include a “list of all hazardous chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing,” and are then posted on the Department of Environmental Protection’s website. Public access would bring Pennsylvania in line with the four other disclosure states. It’s unclear whether the recommendation would change the scope of chemicals reported.


Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Colorado Gov. Hickenlooper Proposes Fracking Fluid Rule - Charlatan

Dan Elliott
The Associated Press
Post Independent
Glenwood Springs, CO Colorado



DENVER, Colorado — Gov. John Hickenlooper proposed Tuesday that energy companies operating in his state be required to publicly disclose the ingredients of the fluids they inject into the ground to extract more oil and gas, even though he said there is almost no chance the fluids are contaminating water wells.

“It's almost inconceivable” that so-called fracking fluids affect groundwater because they are released far below the level of the water, Hickenlooper told a Colorado Oil and Gas Association conference in Denver.

Disclosing the contents would help build public trust in the industry, said Hickenlooper, a Democrat and former petroleum geologist.

Fracking involves pumping a high-pressure mix of water and chemicals to crack rock formations deep underground and release oil and gas. The practice has taken on national importance as companies use it in more states.


Texas has a new law that will require energy companies to reveal the makeup of fracking fluids. Pennsylvania plans to measure baseline public health conditions in the northeastern part of the state to help track any future health impact from drilling.

Energy companies resist revealing what is in their fracking fluids, saying the contents are proprietary and disclosing them could hurt their ability to compete. Critics, including environmental groups, say the chemicals could be tainting drinking water.
Tisha Conoly Schuller, president and CEO of the Colorado Oil and Gas Association, said the industry is “open to working with the administration” on disclosure rules.

Hickenlooper said fracking disclosure rules for Colorado would be written and enforced by the state Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates the energy industry in Colorado.
The energy industry has been harshly critical of...

 
Your forgetting one chronic element  Mr. Hickenlooper; produced water spills on the surface are happening every single day across Colorado.  If you knew what we knew, you would retract your statement above: “It's almost inconceivable” that so-called fracking fluids affect groundwater because they are released far below the level of the water."
 
Tell us the probability versus the possibility Mr. Hickenlooper when Colorado will eventually have over 100,000 active O&G wells. One need not be a scientist or a biased petroleum geologist, such as yourself to make a sound assessment that fracking is an archaic and inept method.

You appear to not be a good fit for the benefit of Colorado's natural resources. We didn't vote for you! Your feeble attempts at winning the hearts of the citizens is clearly false.  You are now proposing frac-fluid disclosures to only fight the current resistance.  Again,  fracking is an archaic and inept method. It's charlatan at best.
.

CAST YOUR VOTE