Showing posts with label Colorado Environmental Coalition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Colorado Environmental Coalition. Show all posts

Monday, September 5, 2011

Colorado’s Oil and Gas Rules - Colorado Environmental Coalition


Fact sheet updated 1/25/2011

The results are in: the oil and gas rules approved in 2009 have been a resounding success. They have streamlined permitting, cut red tape, and created regulatory consistency. It’s no surprise that the industry’s recovery has been faster in Colorado than in any other Rocky Mountain state. The lesson is clear -- we can protect communities and treasured landscapes while we create a healthier energy industry.

The rules have addressed very real problems. During two decades of rapid development, drilling rigs and gas wells popped up near schools, businesses, and homes. Toxic chemicals contaminated air and drinking water. Poorly planned and unrestrained drilling led to severe fragmentation of wildlife habitat.

In the coming years, as we manage the impacts of oil and gas development, the rules will continue to protect Colorado communities and encourage constructive cooperation between citizens and industry.

How the rules protect us
Drinking water. The new rules protect drinking water supplies by creating a 300 foot buffer around streams that feed our reservoirs. They protect groundwater by requiring waste pits to be lined and disposed of at appropriate facilities.

Clean air. The new rules protect air quality near homes, schools, and other occupied buildings in northwest Colorado by requiring emission control devices on equipment.

Chemical information during an emergency. The new rules, though not requiring public disclosure of chemicals used in drilling operations, do give officials and medical professionals a right to information needed to respond to emergencies at well sites.

Groundwater testing. The rules help keep polluters accountable by requiring testing in southeastern Colorado at coalbed methane well sites.

Jobs and the economy: the facts
The 2009 slowdown in oil and gas development was caused by economic factors, not by the rules. The recession, an oversupply of gas, and the steep decline in natural gas prices led to the 2009 slowdown. (2008 gas price: $8-10 per thousand cubic ft. 2009 gas price: $2-3 per thousand cubic ft.)1

Colorado is rebounding faster than other states in the West. Since the rules took effect in April 2009, Colorado has outpaced neighboring states in oil and gas activity. 2010 saw the third highest number of permits issued in state history. Colorado is the regional leader in permits issued and new well starts – ahead of Wyoming, New Mexico, Utah and Montana.2

The rules have cut red tape for industry. Processing time for drilling permits has declined since the rules took effect. (63 days in 2008 vs. 35 days by late 2010)3

1 COGCC report presented to Joint Budget Committee, Jan. 7, 2010, aka "Natural Resources Hearing," p. 4

2
"Colorado on Pace in 2010 for Third Most Drilling Permits … Denver Post, Dec. 21, 2010. For 2009 performance, see "Natural Resources Hearing. For first half of 2010, see Neslin memo to COGCC, June 23, 2010.

3 Neslin memo to COGCC, June 23, 2010. Neslin, "Northwest Colorado Oil and Gas Forum," Nov. 2010.

For more information contact: Charlie Montgomery, CEC, 303.405-6707, charlie@ourcolorado.org



What oil and gas interests are saying about the rules ...

"We are not looking for any wholesale changes and we are not asking for any legislation this year…What a lot of producers and the whole business community wants is business certainty. We can mostly live with what we've got," he said. 2011 Legislative Fact Sheet | Colorado Environmental Coalition

Doug Flanders, Colorado Oil and Gas Association, Denver Post, Dec. 31, 2010 http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_16982663

"Washington policymakers considering stronger regulations sometimes look to the states for ideas. Colorado’s new oil and gas regulations may be providing exactly that."
Nick Snow, "OGJ Washington Pulse Blog," Oil&Gas Journal, Aug. 19, 2010 http://www.ogj.com/index/blogs/washington-pulse/blogs/OGJ/washington-pulse/post987_2943840259389535922.html

"I’d say we’ve been pleased with the communication channels we’ve had with all the state agencies as all of us have implemented the new rules."
Jim Branch, Piceance Project executive for ExxonMobil Production Co., Grand Junction Daily Sentinel, Dec. 12, 2009. http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/content/news/stories/2009/12/29/123009_Energy_gas_side_www.html

"We really think that …Colorado has been a leader, and we think the state rules and regs have been sufficient … "[W]e went through the process on the rules and regs in Colorado and in Wyoming and we support the states’ efforts …"
Lisa Hough, BP Senior Director of Government and Public Affairs, Colorado Independent, July 30, 2010 http://coloradoindependent.com/58499/colorado-conservation-groups-push-congress-for-tougher-drilling-regs

"The new rules, we didn’t know how that was going to manifest itself, but we’ve seen some good progress. Now, things are pretty consistent."
Al Harrison, Vice President of exploration and production for the Denver region and the Piceance Basin, Williams Corporation, Grand Junction Daily Sentinel, Aug. 3, 2010 http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/articles/hickenlooper_talks_about_creat/P20/

For more information contact: Charlie Montgomery, CEC, 303.405-6707, charlie@ourcolorado.org

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Fracking Study Denied In Colorado Legislature


Panel denies fracking study

Legislator sought review of chemicals, report of complaints

Durango Herald

DENVER – The state will not get involved with a study of chemicals used in natural-gas drilling, legislators decided Monday.

Rep. Roger Wilson, D-Glenwood Springs, wanted state agencies to review an upcoming federal study to see if hydraulic fracturing is affecting drinking water. He also wanted a report to the Legislature about the number of complaints to the state about fracking.

But Wilson’s House Bill 1172 died on a 4-8 vote in the House Agriculture, Livestock and Natural Resources Committee.

The bill drew criticism from both defenders of the gas industry and its harshest critics.
Republicans on the panel said they think fracking gets a bad reputation that it does not deserve.
Wilson said his bill would have quelled public concerns.

“That is exactly why I think this bill is important. Without the public having confidence that we’re looking at the scientific information that’s coming out, the public’s choice is to increase their suspicion and superstition about what’s going on,”


Rep. Roger Wilson, D-Glenwood Springs said:

Drillers frequently pump water, sand and chemicals into wells to fracture the underground rock formations and stimulate gas production. Environmentalists worry that the fracking fluid could contaminate drinking water, but in 2005 Congress exempted the fluids from the Safe Drinking Water Act.

The controversy has raged ever since, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is taking a new look at the issue in a study to be done by 2012.

Environmentalists were split on the bill. The Colorado Environmental Coalition supported it, but the Earthworks Oil and Gas Accountability Project, based in Durango, opposed it.

OGAP lawyer Alan Curtis said the group would like to see a detailed baseline study of water quality in order to be able to measure possible pollution from drilling. But he did not want to put the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in charge of the study, as Wilson’s bill did.
“Our experience with the commission has been that their primary motivation is to see that there is as much oil and gas production in the state as can be done. And the water quality concerns are secondary,” Curtis said.

The state’s oil and gas commission already is reviewing its database in light of federal information that showed some gas drillers used diesel fuel for hydraulic fracturing. That review was not part of Wilson’s bill.

Rep. J. Paul Brown, R-Ignacio, did not want the Legislature to get a report on complaints filed against the gas industry.

“I have a little problem with complaints from the public. You can complain about just about anything,” Brown said, noting that people have filed harassing complaints against his ranching operation. “This should not be able to happen.”

Brown and Rep. Don Coram, R-Montrose – whose district covers part of Montezuma County – voted against the HB 1172.

jhanel@durango herald.com

---------------------

Is this guy a daft politician or has special interst consumed his life to hide the facts?

VIEW Section 322 For the truth

CAST YOUR VOTE