Showing posts with label METHANE SEEPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label METHANE SEEPS. Show all posts

Saturday, January 7, 2012

COGCC requests emergency funding for explosive levels of methane seeping into occupied residential homes from abandoned oil and gas wells

This cause came on for an emergency hearing before the Colorado OIl and Gas Conservation Commission on January 13, 2011, in Suite 801, 1120 Lincoln Street, Denver, Colorado for an order to allow the expenditure of additional monies from the Oil and Gas Conservation and Environmental Response Fund. The Commission held this emergency hearing pursuant to its authority under §34-60-108(3), C.R.S. (2010).











BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF COLORADO


IN THE MATTER OF EXPENDITURES FROM THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND FOR THE COLORADO OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
)
)
)
)
CAUSE NO. 1E
ORDER NO. 1E-10


REPORT OF THE COMMISSION


This cause came on for an emergency hearing before the Commission on January 13, 2011, in Suite 801, 1120 Lincoln Street, Denver, Colorado for an order to allow the expenditure of additional monies from the Oil and Gas Conservation and Environmental Response Fund. The Commission held this emergency hearing pursuant to its authority under §34-60-108(3), C.R.S. (2010).



FINDINGS



The Commission Finds as follows:


1. The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s (“COGCC”) annual Appropriation 075 used for environmental complaint investigation ($312,033) and Appropriation 076 used for special environmental projects ($325,000) line item budgets for fiscal year ending June 30, 2011 have nearly been entirely obligated or exhausted. Finding Nos. 2 through 7, below, describe work required to ensure public safety in portions of the historic Florence oil field where seeps of thermogenic, wet natural gas into and under occupied dwellings are present. COGCC Staff recommend that the work be completed during the current fiscal year ending June 30, 2011.


2. One orphaned oil well (thought to be the Florence Oil and Refining Company #1, API # 05-043-40078) in the SW¼ of Section 15, Township 19 South, Range 69 West, 6th P.M., was plugged in 2009 using Plugging and Well Reclamation (“PAWR”) funds, Appropriation 060. The orphan well is located in a residential section of the City of Florence. Compilations of well records done in 1908 and 1909 by the U.S. Geological Survey (“USGS”) staff indicate that there may be at least five other oil wells that were drilled prior to 1909 within a few hundred yards of the plugged orphan oil well. Interviews with local residents indicate that two of these may have been used as domestic gas wells in the last twenty years. The USGS maps indicate another orphaned oil well may be located in the SE¼ of Section 16, Township 19 South, Range 69 West, 6th P.M., where a mobile home park exists today. The mobile home park contains 30 to 40 mobile homes.


3. Soil gas surveys in portions of said Sections 15 and 16 were done prior to and then again subsequent to the plugging of the orphan well. These soil gas surveys were funded using Appropriation 076 funds for special environmental projects. The follow-up surveys indicate that soil gas concentrations around and under residences have not decreased subsequent to the plugging of the orphan well. Five homes are located over or in close proximity to the gas seeps.


4. COGCC Southern Colorado Field Inspection Supervisor Mike Leonard identified small circular areas of stressed vegetation in the late fall of 2010 in close proximity to oil well locations interpreted from the 1909 USGS records. He also determined gas was actively seeping from one of the stressed vegetation areas. He also determined that explosive levels of methane were present in the shallow soils immediately adjacent to one of the mobile homes in the area.


5. COGCC Staff propose to investigate and determine the sources of gas seeping in this residential area. The investigation will include detailed investigations of the gas seeps. Trenching and excavating will be the primary method used to locate orphaned well bores. Flux surveys of gas seepage volumes will be done simultaneously with trenching and excavating to better locate the sources of gas and the directions in which the gas is migrating. Other tools that may be used are magnetometers, ground penetrating radar as well as handheld infrared or other gas leak detector devices. Sampling and characterization of gases from seeps and oil wells in the area will also be used to better understand sources of the seeps.


6. COGCC Staff also propose to aid the local residents to better ensure immediate safety in their homes by purchasing and installing gas monitoring devices as needed. Other passive mitigation measures may also be used such as venting of combustible soil gases away from homes and residences.


7. This project designed to ensure human health safety and welfare has estimated costs and expenditures of $67,000. As described in Finding No. 1, funds for this project are not available from Appropriation 075 which is used for environmental response or from Appropriation 076 which is used for special environmental projects in this fiscal year. COGCC staff believes that this project needs to be done as soon as practicable due to the potential risk to human safety posed by gas believed to be leaking from orphaned oil wells in the area.


ORDER


NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED, that in accordance with §34-60-124(7), C.R.S., the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission hereby authorizes the expenditure of Sixty Seven Thousand dollars ($67,000) from the One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00) Emergency Response line item for the investigation of significant adverse impacts to public health, safety, welfare, and the environment that may be associated with the conduct of oil and gas operations.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the provisions contained in the above order shall become effective forthwith.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Commission expressly reserves its right, after notice and hearing, to alter, amend, or repeal any and/or all of the above orders.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that under the State Administrative Procedure Act the Commission considers this order to be final agency action for purposes of judicial review within thirty (30) days after the date this order is mailed by the Commission.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that an application for reconsideration by the Commission of this order is not required prior to the filing for judicial review.


ENTERED this day of January, 2011, as of January 13, 2011


OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF COLORADO



By

Robert A. Willis, Acting Secretary


Dated at Suite 801

1120 Lincoln St.

Denver, Colorado 80203

January 18, 2011

-----------------
Data compiled and submitted by: Shane Davis
-----------------


Does this prove that abandoned wells have the ability to cause a significant risk to the environment and human health?  "There are more than 86,000 abandoned, abandoned and plugged wells in the State of Colorado where any number of them could pose a significant risk due to the lack of well-bore integrity over time. Many of these historic wells are being re-entered and are being fracked using new technologies with much higher pressures than were used in the past."

One example was when Mr. Anderson's water well in Weld County was reportedly contaminated by Eddy Oil Company. It appears the operator re-entered a historic well and subsequently discovered two holes in the cement casing and the well-bore lost pressure thus contaminating not only Mr. Anderson's water well, but the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer." said Shane Davis, Researcher and Chairman of the Poudre Canyon Group, Sierra Club.

"It's a very serious concern that needs to be recognized and addressed to forecast the probability of adverse environmental and human health impacts from mining using hydraulic fracturing on historic wells." I think it's a mistake to not address this real concern." said Davis.

Link for historic well that reportedly contaminated the Laramie-Hills Fox aquifer can be found HERE


Sunday, November 6, 2011

Coal Bed Methane vs Deep Shale Gas/Oil: Is Deeper Safer?

Citizens for Huerfano County

Shell says deep drilling – as far as 14,500 feet below the surface –is much safer than coal bed methane (CBM). Citizens for Huerfano County reviews the scientific and empirical evidence below that suggests deeper is NOT safer.
In 1998 Petroglyph Energy, Inc. began developing the CBM Little Creek Field near the River Ridge Ranch subdivision between Walsenburg and La Veta (Huerfano County, southern Colorado), eventually completing more than 50 wells. Wells depths ranged from 1,300 to 3,900 feet deep. Fewer than 10 non-CBM wells have also been drilled by Manzano, LLC since that time.

Shawn Fiorentino inspects his mother's well after a methane explosion
CBM disaster

Contrary to the industry’s repeated promise of jobs and prosperity, CBM ushered in an era that, in 2008, Rep. John Salazar described as “appalling and dire.”

The disastrous details are all too familiar to the residents of River Ridge Ranch and other rural Coloradans who live with oil and gas development. According to the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) records, the state agency responsible for regulating the oil and gas industry:
  • Petroglyph produced huge amounts of water but very little gas, drawing local water tables down more than 2,000 acre feet per year (Colorado Geological Survey, 2007).
Broad industry exemptions to the Safe Drinking Water Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Superfund Act and other laws, have allowed the release of untold amounts of contaminated CBM production waste into regional air and water sheds.

In 2007, the Colorado Oil and Gas Commission issued a rare Cease and Desist Order to Petroglyph until it could operate "in a manner that protects [the] public health and safety". Earlier this year, Petroglyph announced it was pulling out of Huerfano County, leaving the problems outlined above and a mountain of unresolved questions about the long-term health, water resource and environmental effects of CBM extraction, in its wake.

Enter Royal Dutch Shell

Just as Petroglyph is plugging wells and preparing to leave, Shell Western Exploration and Production, Inc., (SWEPI), a division of Royal Dutch Shell, the world’s second largest petroleum company, began leasing mineral rights and conducting seismic testing in Huerfano County.

In Spring 2011, Shell proposed a 14,500-foot deep exploratory well near the town of La Veta. If an economically feasible discovery is made, this could usher in a new wave of oil and gas development in Huerfano.

Shell insists it will avoid the problems of CBM by drilling thousands of feet below ground and drinking water sources.

Is deeper safer? Or could Shell’s 14,500-foot deep natural gas drilling result in the same kinds of problems (or worse) as Petroglyph’s 2,000-foot deep CBM wells?
A clue to the movement of methane gas (and other frack-related substances) into the water wells in River Ridge Ranch lies in the areas unique and complex geology. Dramatic 100-foot tall radial dikes extend broadly from the base of Spanish Peaks down into the valley to the east. Both the dikes and the Spanish Peaks were formed when hot magma pushed up through the layers of sedimentary rock that contain oil and gas shales and water.

The result, according to hydrologist Thad McLaughlin, an expert on Huerfano County ground water, is "shale that normally has little or no permeability may be highly permeable where it lies adjacent to the intrusive rocks [i.e. dikes]”.

Thus, the dikes create communication between geological zones, otherwise assumed to be isolated (Fig. 4 below illustrates how dikes cross through different strata).

Worrall, 2004. Figure 4. Cross-section of Oakdale field, depicting a felsite intrusive body along a shallow thrust (pg. 6).


How deep the dikes go is unknown, but because they are derived from magma, they are certain to extend several miles down. In 2009, Spoon Valley Energy had to relocate a well when it struck an impenetrable intrusive dike 6,200 feet below the surface while drilling for gas near La Veta.

"Leaky dikes" (McLaughlin, 1966, Barkman, 2004), previously undetected faults (USGS, 2001) and sand channels (Denney, 2007), are three types of conduits that could allow contaminants and fracking fluids to migrate in unexpected ways. Without a better scientific understanding of the risks of drilling and fracking in Huerfano's complex geological environment, Shell's claim that "deeper is safer" is unfounded.

The potential for oil and gas drilling to dislodge and release naturally occurring, but highly toxic substances like hydrogen sulfide (known seeps occur on Middle Creek Road, Indian Creek and Sulphur Springs Road west of La Veta) and radioactive vanadium and uranium (there are 11 known radioactive occurrences in Huerfano County, Minedat.com) is also troubling, especially since the EPA and COGCC don't require monitoring of radioactive substances in flow back or production fluids.

Many impacts from oil and gas activities occur on the surface, irrespective of the depth of the well. Deep drilling and fracking require enormous water and chemical inputs that must be trucked over rural back roads increasing the danger of surface spills and accidents. A 2008 ProPublica investigation found more than 1,000 documented cases of contamination in the US, including cases in Huerfano County.

Pollution from flowback and open production water pits leak and are subject to flooding. Even worse, they release harmful chemicals into the air we breathe.

Fracking uses an average of 5.3 million gallons of water per well. What impact will a new gas and oil play have on Huerfano's already stretched water resources? This important question will be the subject of a future post.

For: Citizens for Huerfano County
PO Box 1193 | La Veta CO 81055

CAST YOUR VOTE